Kināyah Dan Ṣarīḥ Dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an
Studi Perbandingan Tinjauan Balaghah Arab dan Semiotika Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47498/bashair.v5i2.5063Keywords:
ṣarīḥ, Kināyah, Balaghah, Semiotics, Qur'anic interpretationAbstract
This study examines the comparative interpretation of ṣarīḥ (explicit) and kināyah (implicit) in the Qur'an through two main approaches, namely classical Arabic balaghah and modern Western semiotic theory. This study uses a qualitative-descriptive-comparative approach by analyzing three selected verses, namely QS. Al-Baqarah: 183, QS. Al-Baqarah: 223, and QS. An-Nūr: 31. The purpose of this study is to explore how literal and symbolic meanings are constructed in Islamic sacred texts. The results show that ṣarīḥ lafaz are generally used in legal contexts, with a strict and direct meaning structure. In contrast, kināyah lafaz tend to be used to convey social and ethical values through symbolic and contextual language styles. The balaghah approach emphasizes aesthetic and rhetorical aspects, while the semiotic approach-especially from the thoughts of Ferdinand de Saussure, Charles Sanders Peirce, and Roland Barthes-opens up room for interpretation of connotative, ideological, and cultural meanings in the text. This study concludes that the integration of balaghah and semiotics approaches can enrich the interdisciplinary method of Qur'anic interpretation. In addition, this approach also offers a hermeneutic alternative that is more responsive to contemporary social and intellectual dynamics.
References
Al-Qurthubi, I. (2009). Tafsir Al-Qur’an. Terj. Muhyiddin Mas Rida Dan M. Rana Mengala. Mukhlis B Mukti. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam.
Ar-Rāzī, F. (1990). Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ at-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Arifuddin, A. (2021). TEORI NAZHM ABDULQĀHIR AL-JURJANĪ DALAM DALĀ’ILU ‘L-I’JĀZ DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN ILMU MA’ĀNĪ. Center of Middle Eastern Studies (CMES), 7(2), 140–153.
Az-Zamakhsyarī, M. ibn ‘Umar. (2019). Al-Kasysyāf ‘an Ḥaqā’iq Ghawāmiḍ Al-Tanzīl Wa ‘Uyūn Al-Aqāwīl Fī Wujūh Al-Ta’wīl. Ibdā‘ li al-i‘lām wa al-Nasyr.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythology. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (2021). Mythologies. In Design and Culture (Vol. 3, Issue 1). Taylor & Francis.
Caputo, J. D. (1988). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Indiana University Press.
Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches.
De Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics Bloomington. Indiana University.
Haq, F. M., Fatmawati, F., & Amin, A. R. (2024). Analisis Komprehensif Lafaz Sharih Dan Kinayah: Makna, Penerapan Dalam Nash, dan Implikasi Hukumnya. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(4).
Idfi, M. W. (2024). Penerapan Sharih dan Kinayah dalam Perceraian. Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 9(2), 46–55.
Jaffer, T. (2014). Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on the Soul (al-nafs) and Spirit (al-rūḥ): An Investigation into the Eclectic Ideas of Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 16(1), 93–119.
Katsir, I. (2008). tafsir ibnu katsir. In Tafsir Ibnu Katsir (Vol. 1).
Mawardi, M. M. S., & Bustami, Z. (2023). Ijtihad Bayani Sebagai Metode Penemuan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 22(2).
Miller, C. (2003). Variation and change in Arabic urban vernaculars. In Approaches to Arabic dialects (pp. 177–206). Brill.
Mir, M. (1986). Coherence in the Qur’an. A Study of Işlāhīs concept of Nazm in Taddabur-i Qur’an. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications.
Moleong, L. J., & Surjaman, T. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.
Peirce, C. S. (1931). 1958, CP, Collected Papers, Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss (eds.)(volúmenes 1–6), y Arthur Burks (ed.)(volúmenes 7 y 8). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Peirce, C. S. (2013). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce (Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
Saussure, F. de. (2006). Writings in general linguistics.
Tahir, M., & Syatar, A. (2024). Kajian Lafaz Dari Segi Penggunaan Makna Sharih Dan Kinayah (Makna Penerapan Dalam Nash Dan Implikasi Hukumnya). Jurnal Tafsere, 12(1), 72–85.
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective. OUP Us.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Nur, Wawan Susanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish articles in Basha'ir: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an & Tafsir agree to the following conditions:
- The author retains copyright and grants the Basha'ir Journal the right from the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license that allows others to make changes, adjust and build on the work with recognition of the author's work and initial publication in the Journal.
- Authors are allowed to copy and redistribute published versions of works in journals (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with recognition of their initial publication in Basha'ir: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an & Tafsir.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, and increase citations of published works
